Ultimate Potential

Test Perspective

News

Every highway tells a story — of movement, opportunity, and progress. But some corridors also carry stories of conflict, near-misses, unsafe crossings, and unpredictable patterns that put lives at risk.


The Hapachara–Tulungia section of NH-31 in Assam was one such corridor. High pedestrian movement, unauthorized openings, school zones, fog-prone conditions, and multiple conflicting turning movements created an environment of daily risk.


Translink was engaged by NHIDCL to conduct a comprehensive Road Safety Audit (RSA). What followed was not merely an engineering review — it was a transformation in how a corridor could function, protect, and sustain safe mobility.

Test Content

Transforming the Hapachara–Tulungia Corridor

The Challenge

The corridor experienced:

  • Unregulated crossroads in close proximity
  • Unauthorized median openings resulting in contraflow
  • Heavy pedestrian and school-going children crossing at-grade
  • Market-related movements disrupting traffic flow
  • Nighttime visibility challenges intensified by fog
  • Inadequate delineation and warning systems

 

These conditions created an ecosystem of continuous conflicts, especially involving vulnerable road users.

  • Test
  • Test
  • Test

Translink’s Diagnostic Lens

Instead of treating deficiencies as isolated issues, Translink applied a multi-dimensional safety intelligence approach, combining:

 

  • Behavioural movement mapping
  • Desire line analysis
  • Speed environment evaluation
  • Night audits with calibrated reflectivity checks
  • Drone-based conflict mapping
  • Geometry consistency review
  • Access behaviour assessment

 

This revealed a clear insight:
Most safety risks were behavioural and operational, not purely geometric.

Strategic Interventions Recommended

1.Safer Access & Turning Movements

  • Closure of unauthorized openings
  • IRC-compliant median opening upgrades
  • Turning storage lanes
  • Smooth radii to ensure predictable vehicle behaviour

2.Protecting Pedestrians & School Children

 

  • Proposed Foot Over Bridge (FOB)
  • Refuge islands for mid-block crossings
  • Designated pedestrian crossings with improved visibility

3.Eliminating Contraflow

 

  • Removal of unsafe entry points
  • Channelisation and lane guidance
  • Service-road-based access restructuring

4.Enhancing Night & Fog Safety

 

  • Retroreflective markings
  • Hazard markers at curves
  • High-intensity delineators
  • Fog-route advisory signage

Expected Impact

The bundled interventions are projected to deliver:

 

 

  • 70–80% reduction in conflicts
  • Elimination of severe head-on risks from contraflow
  • Dramatic improvement in pedestrian safety
  • More predictable driving environment
  • Safer fog-season travel

     

 

This case demonstrated how technical precision, behavioural insight, and human sensitivity reshape safety outcomes.

What This Case Reveals About Road Safety

The Hapachara–Tulungia study reinforces three truths:

 

  1. Unsafe behaviour emerges when design does not guide movement.
  2. Unregulated access is the single biggest creator of risk on national corridors.
  3. Vulnerable users must be engineered into the design, not engineered around it.

 

The case study underscores the importance of designing with human behaviour in mind, not against it.

More Perspectives